…or, rather, the inequivalence of life and existence.
Roughly one and a half year ago, in a middle of a chilly night of April, I was lying on my back in a Swedish cemetery. Not dead was I, yet death was the very thing that drove me there. That night was sort of a beginning to certain considerations I would keep coming back to over and over again, and in a way, rather straightforward continuation to other things that had happened earlier. Now, we are talking about life, death and existence within the bounds of these two.
Ever since dumping the pantheistic mysticism I held on to some extent during my early teens, my attitude towards death and dying has been quite indifferent. Not that I haven’t cared if I lived or died, but that there’s no point in making a big fuzz about the transition. Yet, death is vital. It bounds and defines life as we understand it, even to the point that it’s absurd to speak about “life after death” (zombie movies notwithstanding). How could we, who are bound to the flesh so tightly that the whole modern culture is based on the material (you know, the quality of your life is valued by the things you have), ever understand an immaterial existence and, indeed, the possibility of being without living? In this sense, I quote, it is often a lot more useful to go in depths wondering if there’s life before death, rather than after it. So go on then, indulgence with life and remember to drink one for the good ol’ Anton!
Nevertheless, sooner or later you will hit those cemetery gates. What was it then, that I found in the Swedish cemetery on that night? An axiom old, or rather timeless: the biological life and the individual existence are not equal. Your very being, however attached to the old body in this natural world, is something that may thrive even when the carnal part of your human manifestation fails. Just like the ageless bear of the northern tribes,¹ you are essentially a non-natural being. As the saying goes: “we are not humans having a spiritual experience, we are spiritual beings having a human experience”.² There is something “beyond” the natural world – and Quite A Something it is!
Now don’t get me wrong. This is not a matter of faith or silly gospels, or even sillier ideas about heavens and hells. It is a thought reasoned, tested and, indeed, experienced. So don’t take just my word for it. Go find it yourself, and you might learn a thing or two on the way that will help you become something you never even dreamed of.
◊
[1] More on the bear later on.
[2] Often attributed to Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.